| Abstract | This study investigates the high-temperature tensile properties of laser-welded AA5052-H36 and AA6061-T6 aluminum alloys, utilizing experimental and statistical analysis. Tensile tests were conducted at temperatures ranging from 25°C to 300°C at corresponding strain rates of 0.01 and 0.1 s⁻¹. The results indicate that AA5052-H36 exhibits superior mechanical strength compared to AA6061-T6, with a near-linear decrease in ultimate tensile strength, showing a reduction of approximately 60% from 273 MPa at 100°C to 108 MPa at 300°C. AA5052-H36 also shows consistent increases in fracture strain across the tested conditions, with fracture strain rising from 0.14 at 100°C to 0.37 at 300°C. In contrast, AA6061-T6 displays a non-linear decline in UTS, dropping by 51%, from 220 MPa at 100°C to 110 MPa at 300°C, and an increase in fracture strain from 0.05 at 100°C to 0.07 at 300°C. This non-linear behavior is linked to the dissolution of β" phases and the subsequent precipitation of β' phases, as revealed by the differential scanning calorimetry curve. Statistical analysis confirms that temperature is the dominant factor influencing tensile performance, with notable contributions from phase transformations observed in the DSC curve. Energy absorption analysis highlights the advantages of AA5052-H36, which absorbs considerably more energy before failure compared to AA6061-T6, due to its greater plastic deformation capacity. AA5052-H36 absorbs up to 13.3 J at 250°C, while AA6061-T6 absorbs a maximum of 3.3 J at the same temperature. Both alloys show maximum energy absorption at 250°C, with increasing temperature leading to a rise in absorbed energy up to 13.3 J. However, beyond 250°C, the energy absorption decreases substantially. In conclusion, while AA5052-H36 may offer superior performance in high-temperature tensile loading compared to AA6061-T6, the choice of alloy for applications above 250°C should be made with careful consideration of the trade-offs, including strength, corrosion resistance, and manufacturability, to prevent possible creep-related failures. |
|---|
