Investigation of the through-plane impedance technique for evaluation of anisotropy of proton conducting polymer membranes

From National Research Council Canada

DOIResolve DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelechem.2008.05.017
AuthorSearch for: ; Search for: 1 ; Search for: 1 ; Search for: ; Search for: 1 ; Search for: 1 
Name affiliation
  1. National Research Council Canada. NRC Institute for Fuel Cell Innovation
FormatText
TypeArticle
Journal titleJournal of Electroanalytical Chemistry
ISSN1572-6657
1873-2569
Volume622
Issue2
Pages145–152
SubjectAC impedance; through-plane conductivity; anisotropy; PEM
Abstract
Two-probe electrochemical cells were designed for proton conductivity evaluation in the X, Y and Z directions using electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS). Nafion® 112, 115, 1135, 117 and 211 membranes were used to examine the conductivity in the three given directions, and to determine the influence of cell configuration and probe geometry on the accuracy and reproducibility of the measurement. Emphasis is placed on obtaining an understanding of the real system and adequate transfer of the physical processes into the form of the equivalent circuit for the extraction of reliable conductivity data. In order to verify that the method can determine anisotropic conductivity, novel fluorous block copolymers with various anisotropic phase segregated morphologies were evaluated. All polymer electrolyte membranes examined exhibited a Nyquist plot response in the form of a straight line with an angle of approximately 70°–80° to the Z′-axis. Interfacial capacitance, membrane bulk resistance and membrane bulk capacitance were considered as contributing parameters to the impedance of the system; high frequency inductance and contact resistance were instrumentally minimized. A marginally anisotropic conductivity (σ=/σ⊥ = 1.0–1.4) was found in all Nafion® samples. Fluorous block copolymers with disordered morphology exhibited higher conductivity in the through-plane direction by a factor of 1.4. For the polymers with perforated lamellae and lamellae morphologies, in-plane conductivities were larger by factors of 2.4 and 5.5, respectively.
Publication date
PublisherElsevier
Terms of use
LanguageEnglish
Peer reviewedYes
NPARC number23001994
Export citationExport as RIS
Report a correctionReport a correction
Record identifier0ce2bb13-f0bd-4bb4-a4b2-6659fe229a50
Record created2017-07-14
Record modified2017-07-14
Date modified:
Report a problem on this page