| DOI | Resolve DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ndteint.2018.11.010 |
|---|
| Author | Search for: Duan, Yuxia; Search for: Zhang, Hai; Search for: Maldague, Xavier P.V.; Search for: Ibarra-Castanedo, Clemente; Search for: Servais, Pierre; Search for: Genest, Marc1; Search for: Sfarra, Stefano; Search for: Meng, Jianqiao |
|---|
| Affiliation | - National Research Council Canada. Aerospace
|
|---|
| Format | Text, Article |
|---|
| Subject | thermography; ultrasonic testing; CFRP; impact damage; probability of detection |
|---|
| Abstract | In order to quantitatively compare the reliability of pulsed thermography and ultrasonic testing techniques, a set of thirty-five Carbon Fiber Reinforced Plastic (CFRP) composite panels with impact damages are inspected by pulsed thermography and ultrasonic C-scan. The comparative experimental results and Probability of Detection (PoD) analysis results are presented. The quantitative comparison shows that pulsed thermography testing has smaller defect size at 90% PoD with 95% confidence level, i.e. a90/95 values than ultrasonic testing for the parameters and setup used in the inspections of these thirty-five CFRP composite panels. |
|---|
| Publication date | 2018-11-20 |
|---|
| Publisher | Elsevier |
|---|
| In | |
|---|
| Language | English |
|---|
| Peer reviewed | Yes |
|---|
| Export citation | Export as RIS |
|---|
| Report a correction | Report a correction (opens in a new tab) |
|---|
| Record identifier | 783b2bb3-60e8-430b-8178-a65703cd5881 |
|---|
| Record created | 2019-06-07 |
|---|
| Record modified | 2020-03-16 |
|---|
