| DOI | Resolve DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/LEOS.2006.279055 |
|---|
| Author | Search for: Zilkie, A.; Search for: Meier, J.; Search for: E. Smith, P.; Search for: Mojahedi, M.; Search for: Aitchison, J.; Search for: Poole, P.1; Search for: Allen, C.1; Search for: Barrios, P.1; Search for: Poitras, D.1; Search for: Wang, R.; Search for: Rotter, T.; Search for: Yang, C.; Search for: Stintz, A.; Search for: Malloy, K. |
|---|
| Affiliation | - National Research Council of Canada. NRC Institute for Microstructural Sciences
|
|---|
| Format | Text, Article |
|---|
| Conference | 2006 IEEE LEOS Annual Meeting, October 29-November 2, 2006, Montreal, QC, Canada |
|---|
| Abstract | We compare experimentally the gain recovery times of quantum dot, quantum dash, and quantum well amplifiers based on InP and operating at 1.55mum. The QD device gives the shortest recovery time of ~15 ps |
|---|
| Publication date | 2006-10 |
|---|
| Publisher | IEEE |
|---|
| In | |
|---|
| Language | English |
|---|
| Peer reviewed | Yes |
|---|
| NPARC number | 23001722 |
|---|
| Export citation | Export as RIS |
|---|
| Report a correction | Report a correction (opens in a new tab) |
|---|
| Record identifier | d6d3c77f-77f3-4764-a4e7-e4fd1bb2f611 |
|---|
| Record created | 2017-03-21 |
|---|
| Record modified | 2020-04-22 |
|---|
