| Téléchargement | - Voir le manuscrit accepté : Single-plane versus three-plane methods for relative range error evaluation of medium-range 3D imaging systems (PDF, 1.9 Mio)
|
|---|
| DOI | Trouver le DOI : https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2179591 |
|---|
| Auteur | Rechercher : MacKinnon, David K.1; Rechercher : Cournoyer, Luc1; Rechercher : Beraldin, J.-Angelo1 |
|---|
| Affiliation | - Conseil national de recherches du Canada. Science des mesures et étalons
|
|---|
| Format | Texte, Article |
|---|
| Sujet | relative range error; 3D imaging system; lidar; performance assessment; medium-range optical non-contact 3D imaging system; terrestrial laser scanners; ASTM E57 standards development |
|---|
| Résumé | Within the context of the ASTM E57 working group WK12373, we compare the two methods that had been initially proposed for calculating the relative range error of medium-range (2 m to 150 m) optical non-contact 3D imaging systems: the first is based on a single plane (single-plane assembly) and the second on an assembly of three mutually non-orthogonal planes (three-plane assembly). Both methods are evaluated for their utility in generating a metric to quantify the relative range error of medium-range optical non-contact 3D imaging systems. We conclude that the three plane assembly is comparable to the single-plane assembly with regard to quantification of relative range error while eliminating the requirement to isolate the edges of the target plate face. |
|---|
| Date de publication | 2015-06-21 |
|---|
| Dans | |
|---|
| Série | |
|---|
| Langue | anglais |
|---|
| Publications évaluées par des pairs | Oui |
|---|
| Numéro NPARC | 21275068 |
|---|
| Exporter la notice | Exporter en format RIS |
|---|
| Signaler une correction | Signaler une correction (s'ouvre dans un nouvel onglet) |
|---|
| Identificateur de l’enregistrement | 934d6a08-420c-4218-ab84-4d099c6af218 |
|---|
| Enregistrement créé | 2015-05-06 |
|---|
| Enregistrement modifié | 2020-06-04 |
|---|
