Final report on the CCPR Key Comparison CCPR-K3.2014 Luminous Intensity

Par Conseil national de recherches du Canada

DOI	Trouver le DOI : https://doi.org/10.1088/0026-1394/59/1A/02002
Auteur	Rechercher : Gaertner, Arnold A.¹; Rechercher : Côté, Éric¹; Rechercher : Campos, Joaquin; Rechercher : Obein, Gaël; Rechercher : Blattner, Peter Identifiant ORCID : https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0681-2096; Rechercher : Schafer, Reto; Rechercher : Hui, Liu; Rechercher : Xiaomei, Jiang; Rechercher : Miller, Cameron; Rechercher : Zong, Yuqin; Rechercher : Atkinson, Errol; Rechercher : Thorvaldson, Erik; Rechercher : Kinoshita, Kenichi; Rechercher : Sieberhagen, Rheinhardt; Rechercher : Rabe, Irma; Rechercher : Goodman, Teresa; Rechercher : Scott, Barry; Rechercher : Sperling, Armin; Rechercher : Lindner, Detlef; Rechercher : Khlevnoy, Boris; Rechercher : Ivashin, Evgeniy
Affiliation	Conseil national de recherches du Canada. Centre de recherche en métrologie
Format	Texte, Article
Résumé	The metrological equivalence of national measurement standards in the field of photometry and radiometry is determined by a set of key comparisons chosen and organised by the Consultative Committee of Photometry and Radiometry (CCPR) of the Comité international des poids et mesures (CIPM), working closely with the Regional Metrology Organisations (RMOs). In September 2009 the CCPR decided that a second round of the key comparison K3 Luminous Intensity be commenced. The National Research Council of Canada (NRC) was chosen to pilot this comparison. A total of 12 participants were selected from the three RMO group members: EURAMET&COOMET (6: IO-CSIC, LNE-CNAM, METAS, NPL, PTB, VNIIOFI), APMP&AFRIMETS (4: NMISA, NIM, NMIA, NMIJ), and SIM (2: NIST, NRC). The comparison was organised as a star comparison (NMI-Pilot-NMI) using incandescent standard lamps supplied by each NMI (National Metrology Institute) as the travelling comparison artifact. This report describes the comparison organisation (Section 2), the measurement methods and uncertainties achieved at all the participants and at the pilot (Sections 3 and 4), and the method for analysis and the results of the comparison according to this method (Section 4). It includes a comparison of the results of this comparison with the 1999 first round key comparison (Section 5). Section 6 presents a summary of the comparison.
Date de publication	2022-05-16
Maison d’édition	BIPM IOP Publishing Ltd
Dans	Metrologia 59, nº 1A, 02002 (16 mai 2022).
Langue	anglais
Publications évaluées par des pairs	Oui
Exporter la notice	Exporter en format RIS
Signaler une correction	Signaler une correction (s'ouvre dans un nouvel onglet)
Identificateur de l’enregistrement	afe6a503-6538-44ad-b3bd-ef988ebd277e
Enregistrement créé	2023-07-10
Enregistrement modifié	2023-07-10

Date de modification :: 2024-07-16